Saturday, July 24, 2010

Should US Government make a strong effort to apply secondary prevention efforts in the case of abuse?

Should the United States make a strong effort to apply secondary prevention efforts in the case of abuse? Should, for example, teenage mothers be tracked, monitored, and required to attend parenting classes?

Should US Government make a strong effort to apply secondary prevention efforts in the case of abuse?
NO.





This should be the responsability of the local community.


Having the govenment attempt to micro manage is impossible. It would have to continue in it's cookie cutter approach. Personal attention is not possible when there are thousands in need of intervention. In the local area there may be less than 100. The information should not be kept private, and it should not affect a persons right to live like anyone else. This public knowledge is to protect a victim and not stigmatize. Community intervention should not focus on punishment, but rather education.





Normally a mother even in distress doesn't really want to harm her child. If that is the case, then give what ever support is needed so that mother will accept the education.





A correct analysis is necessary to treat the cause and eliminate problem.
Reply:EVERYONE should be required to attend parenting classes. And WELL before the age where they might give Birth.





And I see no harm in doing what you suggest IN ADDITION.





This is 2007.





Abuse needs to STOP.
Reply:%26gt; Should, for example, teenage mothers be tracked


%26gt; monitored, and required to attend parenting classes?





I've seen this done before, however it was hard to follow because the narration was in German...





As long as they live within the law, You can't infringe on people's individual liberties no matter how stupid or incompetent you think they are..


No comments:

Post a Comment